This product has been designed with aesthetics as the paramount. Its function however is less than clever. The ‘stylish’ shape, if you could call it that, impedes the function by not allowing the bread to go fully into the toaster, resulting in a half-toasted piece of bread needing turning.
It’s not a very bad product but at the same time can’t be called a good one. So it’s hard to see why Bush have made this mediocre toaster that isn’t exactly aimed at a gap in the market. It would make sense if it was an outstanding, new and revolutionary product but, in truth, it isn’t.
All these downfalls combined, I should never have bought it. And I advise anyone else who is looking for such a product to look into it long and hard.
It’s not a very bad product but at the same time can’t be called a good one. So it’s hard to see why Bush have made this mediocre toaster that isn’t exactly aimed at a gap in the market. It would make sense if it was an outstanding, new and revolutionary product but, in truth, it isn’t.
All these downfalls combined, I should never have bought it. And I advise anyone else who is looking for such a product to look into it long and hard.
3 comments:
Sounds like it's form clearly outways it's function Lewis. Pity we couldn't see to make our own minds up?
Your article is good, i couldnt think of that much to write about mine. and yesssss i love the colour pink lol.
:D:D
Your article is good, i couldnt think of that much to write about mine. and yesssss i love the colour pink lol.
:D:D
Post a Comment